Reaction to fire of deck roofs with polyurethane insulation

One of the main mistakes made when evaluating the reaction to fire of building materials is to consider them individually without an overall perspective of the structure.

 As it has been shown in different studies, such as the one carried out by ANPE and PU EUROPE at the LS Fire Testing Institute laboratory, it is important to value the whole constructive solution and to reproduce the final product application in order to obtain realistic values. 

Reaccion fuego cubiertas deck 1

 

Reproduction of the behaviour of the materials in case of fire

The B-Roof test is intended to comply with international standards regarding the behaviour of roofs and their coatings against external fire. The objective of the classification obtained from the B-Roof test is to offer more realistic information about the reaction of the materials in case of fire.

Unlike other classifications, the B-Roof test simulates the effect of air (determinant for fire propagation on decks) and an organic waterproof membrane is placed on top of the material (to simulate its condition in a building).

If only the classifications based on tests on naked products are taken into account, instead of those considering their final application of use, the approach is incomplete and the results will not be realistic. 

 

Differences in behaviour between mineral wool and polyurethane deck roofs

If we take into account the fire safety classification in the regulations, mineral wool obtains a higher rating (A1) than polyurethane (B-s1, d0). This is mainly due to the fact that polyurethane systems are classified as a combustible material.

However, by subjecting both materials to the B-Roof test, polyurethane deck roofs were below the required limit, and thus had a fire-safe behaviour, whereas mineral wool deck roofs did not prevent the spread of fire, but they even favoured the persistence of flames on the deck. This is largely due to the "chimney effect".

 

The danger of the chimney effect

Reaccion fuego cubiertas deck 2

Mineral wool products are non-combustible but fibrous, so that when they are subjected to the B-Roof test and air currents are simulated, their structure lets the air circulate through the frets of the deck, which generates the chimney effect that feeds the fire and propagates it through the waterproof membrane. This phenomenon explains the poor performance of mineral wool decks compared to polyurethane systems.

 

The study conducted by ANPE and PU Europe simulates the real conditions of a fire in a roof isolated with mineral fiber and another with a polyurethane system. Would you like to watch the tests and find out about the results?

Videos: tests of polyurethane's resistance to fire

 

Related posts

Comments

FEATURED POST


Fire response of polyurethane: false myths

Polyurethane systems surround our daily lives, however, we still hear some voices that call into question the response of polyurethane in case of fire. 

Read more

MOST VIEWED ARTICLES

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR BLOG

Nuevo llamado a la acción
CONTACTA CON SYNTHESIA INTERNACIONAL